SourceScore
Comparison

Association for Computing Machinery vs arXiv

Formal CS-publishing society vs preprint-server — paywalled-curated vs open-immediate, both Wikipedia-cited at scale.

Academic

Association for Computing Machinery

dl.acm.org
A·85

Premier U.S. computing society; ACM Digital Library indexes peer-reviewed CS publications.

Higher Index
Academic

arXiv

arxiv.org
A·89

Open-access preprint server for physics, mathematics, computer science; ~2.4M papers since 1991.

Compare on a single dimension

Head-to-head — all four dimensions

DimensionAssociation for Computing MachineryarXivLead
SourceScore Index
Composite
A·85A·89arXiv+4
Citation Discipline
How rigorously cited
A+·96B·78Association+18
Modern Reference
AI-era fitness
B·80A+·95arXiv+15
Citation Velocity
Cited per week
B·80A·93arXiv+13

Why these scores

Citation Discipline

Association for Computing MachineryA+·96

Peer-review across ACM journals + conferences (SIGGRAPH, CHI, etc.); methodology rigorous.

arXivB·78

Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.

Modern Reference

Association for Computing MachineryB·80

ACM Digital Library + DOI per paper; metered access to most papers.

arXivA+·95

DOI + arxiv ID + free PDFs + bulk APIs; among the most LLM-cited sources for technical content.

Citation Velocity

Association for Computing MachineryB·80

Cited by CS research + tech press; specialist academic authority.

arXivA·93

Cited daily by ML/AI papers; default reference for current AI research; ChatGPT/Claude pull arxiv frequently.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Association for Computing Machinery or arXiv?

arXiv scores higher on the SourceScore Index (A 89) vs Association for Computing Machinery (A 85) — a 4-point composite lead across Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, and Citation Velocity. "Better" depends on use case; the per-dimension breakdown below shows where each wins.

Which is more reliable to cite, Association for Computing Machinery or arXiv?

For citation, arXiv is the stronger choice — it scores A (89/100) on the SourceScore Index versus Association for Computing Machinery at A (85/100), a 4-point lead in composite citation quality (Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity). Both can be cited; for higher-stakes references, prefer arXiv.

How does Association for Computing Machinery compare to arXiv on citation discipline?

Association for Computing Machinery scores A+ 96 on Citation Discipline; arXiv scores B 78. Citation Discipline measures how rigorously each source cites primary references — see the per-dimension rationale below for the breakdown.

What's the SourceScore difference between Association for Computing Machinery and arXiv?

Association for Computing Machinery A 85 vs arXiv A 89 on the composite Index. Formal CS-publishing society vs preprint-server — paywalled-curated vs open-immediate, both Wikipedia-cited at scale.

Why does arXiv score higher than Association for Computing Machinery?

arXiv leads by 4 composite points on the SourceScore Index. The rationale section below breaks down where the lead comes from — Citation Discipline, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness), and Citation Velocity. Each dimension is scored from primary methodology criteria.

Other comparisons