Financial Times
ft.com ↗British business + economics daily; rigorous editorial process; pink-paper standard for finance reporting.
Is Financial Times reliable to cite? At grade B (84/100 on the SourceScore Index), Financial Times is a solid, generally citable source.
A — top-tier business journalism; paywall reduces Modern Reference somewhat.
Should you cite Financial Times?
At grade B (84/100), Financial Times is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (88/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Modern Reference, scores 78/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Need recurring mention tracking rather than a one-off readiness audit? Compare AI-visibility tools.
Editorial Code public; multi-source verification; corrections discipline.
How Citation Discipline is scored →Hard paywall reduces full-corpus availability; but B2B partnerships + summaries leak into LLM training.
How Modern Reference is scored →Cited daily in finance reporting; markets move on FT exclusives.
How Citation Velocity is scored →Where Financial Times ranks in our best-of lists
It is on 1 of our 17 lists of the best sources to cite.
Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·88- FT Editorial CodePublic policy on accuracy + sourcing standards.
Modern Reference
B·78- Subscription gateMost articles paywalled; smaller training-corpus footprint.
Citation Velocity
A·86- Finance verticalDefault citation for European markets + economics coverage.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[Financial Times — SourceScore Index 84 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/ft/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/ft/">Financial Times — SourceScore Index 84 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). Financial Times: SourceScore Index 84 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/ft/
3 head-to-head comparisons
See all Financial Times comparisons →Each comparison sets Financial Times beside another source on all three scores and shows which one scores higher on each.
5 sources at Financial Times's tier
See peer group →The five sources with the closest overall score to Financial Times, from any category, and where each one scores higher or lower on Discipline, Modern Reference and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/ft/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: Financial Times"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is Financial Times a reliable source to cite?
Financial Times scores B (84/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, Financial Times is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 88/100, Modern Reference 78/100, and Citation Velocity 86/100 — full breakdown above.
What is Financial Times's SourceScore?
Financial Times (ft.com) scores 84/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 88/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 78/100, Citation Velocity 86/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate Financial Times?
Financial Times is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does Financial Times score B?
A — top-tier business journalism; paywall reduces Modern Reference somewhat.
What is Financial Times?
British business + economics daily; rigorous editorial process; pink-paper standard for finance reporting. Category: News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.