HuffPost
huffpost.com ↗U.S. news + opinion site since 2005; mix of staff reporting + contributor blogs (now-discontinued).
Is HuffPost reliable to cite? At grade C (60/100 on the SourceScore Index), HuffPost is a mid-tier source — usable, but verify key claims against a higher-rated source.
C — mass volume + open-web; staff reporting strong but legacy contributor content drags Discipline.
Should you cite HuffPost?
At grade C (60/100), HuffPost is a mid-tier source — usable, but verify key claims against a higher-rated source.
- Strongest for
- topics where being widely and recently cited matters — its highest dimension is Citation Velocity (76/100).
- Use with care
- Citation Discipline is its lowest dimension (50/100); for tracing claims back to primary references, corroborate with a higher-rated source.
- Bottom line
- Usable as a secondary source — verify key claims against a higher-rated source.
Need recurring mention tracking rather than a one-off readiness audit? Compare AI-visibility tools.
Staff articles strong; legacy contributor blogs (now archived) varying quality; corrections public.
How Citation Discipline is scored →Open-web; broad LLM corpus inclusion; engines increasingly down-weight contributor pieces.
How Modern Reference is scored →High daily output across news + lifestyle + politics; cited within US news ecosystem.
How Citation Velocity is scored →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
D·50- Legacy contributor contentPre-2018 contributor articles still indexed; varying sourcing.
Modern Reference
C·65- Open-webFull corpus available; mixed quality drags weighting.
Citation Velocity
B·76- Daily output~50-100 posts/day across all sections.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[HuffPost — SourceScore Index 60 (C)](https://sourcescore.org/source/huffpost/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/huffpost/">HuffPost — SourceScore Index 60 (C)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). HuffPost: SourceScore Index 60 (C). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/huffpost/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all HuffPost comparisons →Each comparison sets HuffPost beside another source on all three scores and shows which one scores higher on each.
5 sources at HuffPost's tier
See peer group →The five sources with the closest overall score to HuffPost, from any category, and where each one scores higher or lower on Discipline, Modern Reference and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/huffpost/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: HuffPost"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is HuffPost a reliable source to cite?
HuffPost scores C (60/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade C, HuffPost is a mid-tier source — usable, but verify key claims against a higher-rated source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 50/100, Modern Reference 65/100, and Citation Velocity 76/100 — full breakdown above.
What is HuffPost's SourceScore?
HuffPost (huffpost.com) scores 60/100 (Grade C) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 50/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 65/100, Citation Velocity 76/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate HuffPost?
HuffPost is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does HuffPost score C?
C — mass volume + open-web; staff reporting strong but legacy contributor content drags Discipline.
What is HuffPost?
U.S. news + opinion site since 2005; mix of staff reporting + contributor blogs (now-discontinued). Category: News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.