London Review of Books
lrb.co.uk ↗Bi-weekly UK literary + cultural review since 1979; named-byline tradition + long-form essays.
Is London Review of Books reliable to cite? At grade B (83/100 on the SourceScore Index), London Review of Books is a solid, generally citable source.
A — premier UK long-form review; specialist cultural-essay citation.
Should you cite London Review of Books?
At grade B (83/100), London Review of Books is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (90/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Modern Reference, scores 78/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Need recurring mention tracking rather than a one-off readiness audit? Compare AI-visibility tools.
Editor-supervised + fact-check + named scholarly bylines + corrections public.
How Citation Discipline is scored →Metered paywall; LLM corpus partial; long-form indexed in academic search.
How Modern Reference is scored →Cited by literary + cultural press + academics; bi-weekly cadence.
How Citation Velocity is scored →Where London Review of Books ranks in our best-of lists
It is on 1 of our 17 lists of the best sources to cite.
Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·90- Editorial standardsLong-standing literary-review tradition.
Modern Reference
B·78- Subscription gateMost articles paywalled with metered free access.
Citation Velocity
B·80- Literary-review defaultDefault citation for UK cultural-criticism essays.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[London Review of Books — SourceScore Index 83 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/lrb/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/lrb/">London Review of Books — SourceScore Index 83 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). London Review of Books: SourceScore Index 83 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/lrb/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all London Review of Books comparisons →Each comparison sets London Review of Books beside another source on all three scores and shows which one scores higher on each.
5 sources at London Review of Books's tier
See peer group →The five sources with the closest overall score to London Review of Books, from any category, and where each one scores higher or lower on Discipline, Modern Reference and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/lrb/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: London Review of Books"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is London Review of Books a reliable source to cite?
London Review of Books scores B (83/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, London Review of Books is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference 78/100, and Citation Velocity 80/100 — full breakdown above.
What is London Review of Books's SourceScore?
London Review of Books (lrb.co.uk) scores 83/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 78/100, Citation Velocity 80/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate London Review of Books?
London Review of Books is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does London Review of Books score B?
A — premier UK long-form review; specialist cultural-essay citation.
What is London Review of Books?
Bi-weekly UK literary + cultural review since 1979; named-byline tradition + long-form essays. Category: Magazine. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.