SourceScore
Academic

OpenAI Research

openai.com

AI research lab publishing technical papers + GPT model documentation + safety research.

SourceScore Index
B·80Rank #89 of 130 · top 68%Composite weighted across Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.

A- — top-tier AI lab; partial transparency + selective open research.

Should you cite OpenAI Research?

At grade B (80/100), OpenAI Research is a solid, generally citable source.

Strongest for
AI-era retrieval and current-topic queries — its highest dimension is Modern Reference (86/100).
No major weak spot
Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 76/100.
Bottom line
Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Compare OpenAI Research with
Citation Discipline
B·80

Selective peer-review + arxiv publication; some research not fully disclosed (commercial constraints).

About this sub-score →
Modern Reference
A·86

Open papers + research blog + technical reports; broad LLM corpus.

About this sub-score →
Citation Velocity
B·76

Cited by AI research + tech press globally; major model releases drive cycles.

About this sub-score →

Signals behind these scores

Citation Discipline

B·80
  • Selective transparency
    Some flagship work published; some kept proprietary.

Modern Reference

A·86
  • Research publications
    Major papers (GPT-X, RLHF, etc.) widely cited.

Citation Velocity

B·76
  • Model-release cycle
    Major announcements drive same-day citation surges.

Cite this score

Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.

Markdown
[OpenAI Research — SourceScore Index 80 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/openai-research/)
HTML
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/openai-research/">OpenAI Research — SourceScore Index 80 (B)</a>
APA
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). OpenAI Research: SourceScore Index 80 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/openai-research/

2 head-to-head comparisons

See all OpenAI Research comparisons →

OpenAI Research appears in 2 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.

5 sources at OpenAI Research's tier

See peer group →

Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats OpenAI Research on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.

Embed this score

All embed options →

Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.

<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/openai-research/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: OpenAI Research"></iframe>

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenAI Research a reliable source to cite?

OpenAI Research scores B (80/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, OpenAI Research is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 80/100, Modern Reference 86/100, and Citation Velocity 76/100 — full breakdown above.

What is OpenAI Research's SourceScore?

OpenAI Research (openai.com) scores 80/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 80/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 86/100, Citation Velocity 76/100. Verified 2026-04-28.

How does SourceScore evaluate OpenAI Research?

OpenAI Research is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.

Why does OpenAI Research score B?

A- — top-tier AI lab; partial transparency + selective open research.

What is OpenAI Research?

AI research lab publishing technical papers + GPT model documentation + safety research. Category: Academic. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.