Semafor
semafor.com ↗Global news brand founded 2022; structured 'Semaform' format separating reporting + analysis.
Is Semafor reliable to cite? At grade B (76/100 on the SourceScore Index), Semafor is a solid, generally citable source.
B+ — newer brand with strong editorial discipline; building citation velocity.
Should you cite Semafor?
At grade B (76/100), Semafor is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (86/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 70/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Need recurring mention tracking rather than a one-off readiness audit? Compare AI-visibility tools.
Semaform separates reporting + reporter-view + alternative-views; corrections + sourcing transparent.
How Citation Discipline is scored →Open-web; structured-data + newsletter; LLM corpus partial inclusion.
How Modern Reference is scored →Cited within international + media-industry coverage; volume building since 2022 launch.
How Citation Velocity is scored →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·86- Semaform structureBuilt-in transparency about reporter perspective.
Modern Reference
B·76- Newsletter-firstDaily newsletter + signature interviews.
Citation Velocity
B·70- Newer brandCitation rate growing as brand matures.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[Semafor — SourceScore Index 76 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/semafor/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/semafor/">Semafor — SourceScore Index 76 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). Semafor: SourceScore Index 76 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/semafor/
1 head-to-head comparison
See all Semafor comparisons →Each comparison sets Semafor beside another source on all three scores and shows which one scores higher on each.
5 sources at Semafor's tier
See peer group →The five sources with the closest overall score to Semafor, from any category, and where each one scores higher or lower on Discipline, Modern Reference and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/semafor/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: Semafor"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is Semafor a reliable source to cite?
Semafor scores B (76/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, Semafor is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference 76/100, and Citation Velocity 70/100 — full breakdown above.
What is Semafor's SourceScore?
Semafor (semafor.com) scores 76/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 76/100, Citation Velocity 70/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate Semafor?
Semafor is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does Semafor score B?
B+ — newer brand with strong editorial discipline; building citation velocity.
What is Semafor?
Global news brand founded 2022; structured 'Semaform' format separating reporting + analysis. Category: News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.