Semafor
semafor.com ↗Global news brand founded 2022; structured 'Semaform' format separating reporting + analysis.
B+ — newer brand with strong editorial discipline; building citation velocity.
Should you cite Semafor?
At grade B (76/100), Semafor is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (86/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 70/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Semaform separates reporting + reporter-view + alternative-views; corrections + sourcing transparent.
About this sub-score →Open-web; structured-data + newsletter; LLM corpus partial inclusion.
About this sub-score →Cited within international + media-industry coverage; volume building since 2022 launch.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·86- Semaform structureBuilt-in transparency about reporter perspective.
Modern Reference
B·76- Newsletter-firstDaily newsletter + signature interviews.
Citation Velocity
B·70- Newer brandCitation rate growing as brand matures.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[Semafor — SourceScore Index 76 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/semafor/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/semafor/">Semafor — SourceScore Index 76 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). Semafor: SourceScore Index 76 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/semafor/
1 head-to-head comparison
See all Semafor comparisons →Semafor appears in one canonical SourceScore comparison — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at Semafor's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats Semafor on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/semafor/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: Semafor"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is Semafor a reliable source to cite?
Semafor scores B (76/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, Semafor is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference 76/100, and Citation Velocity 70/100 — full breakdown above.
What is Semafor's SourceScore?
Semafor (semafor.com) scores 76/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 76/100, Citation Velocity 70/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate Semafor?
Semafor is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does Semafor score B?
B+ — newer brand with strong editorial discipline; building citation velocity.
What is Semafor?
Global news brand founded 2022; structured 'Semaform' format separating reporting + analysis. Category: News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.