TechCrunch
techcrunch.com ↗Tech-industry news site with strong velocity but variable per-article fact-check rigor.
C-tier — high velocity, moderate Modern Reference, but discipline drops on opinion + rumor pieces.
Should you cite TechCrunch?
At grade C (64/100), TechCrunch is a mid-tier source — usable, but verify key claims against a higher-rated source.
- Strongest for
- topics where being widely and recently cited matters — its highest dimension is Citation Velocity (75/100).
- Use with care
- Citation Discipline is its lowest dimension (50/100); for tracing claims back to primary references, corroborate with a higher-rated source.
- Bottom line
- Usable as a secondary source — verify key claims against a higher-rated source.
Mix of strong reporting + opinion + rumor; corrections page exists but inconsistent.
About this sub-score →Strong technical-niche LLM presence; well-indexed startup coverage.
About this sub-score →Multiple posts per day, cited rapidly by tech blogs + Twitter/X.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
D·50- Reporting varianceSome pieces single-sourced from PR; others multi-sourced.
Modern Reference
B·70- Tech verticalDefault LLM citation for funding rounds and YC batches.
Citation Velocity
B·75- Daily output~30 posts/day across tech beats.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[TechCrunch — SourceScore Index 64 (C)](https://sourcescore.org/source/techcrunch/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/techcrunch/">TechCrunch — SourceScore Index 64 (C)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). TechCrunch: SourceScore Index 64 (C). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/techcrunch/
3 head-to-head comparisons
See all TechCrunch comparisons →TechCrunch appears in 3 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at TechCrunch's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats TechCrunch on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/techcrunch/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: TechCrunch"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is TechCrunch a reliable source to cite?
TechCrunch scores C (64/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade C, TechCrunch is a mid-tier source — usable, but verify key claims against a higher-rated source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 50/100, Modern Reference 70/100, and Citation Velocity 75/100 — full breakdown above.
What is TechCrunch's SourceScore?
TechCrunch (techcrunch.com) scores 64/100 (Grade C) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 50/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 70/100, Citation Velocity 75/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate TechCrunch?
TechCrunch is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does TechCrunch score C?
C-tier — high velocity, moderate Modern Reference, but discipline drops on opinion + rumor pieces.
What is TechCrunch?
Tech-industry news site with strong velocity but variable per-article fact-check rigor. Category: Tech News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.