SourceScore
Health

The Lancet

thelancet.com ↗

Peer-reviewed general medical journal since 1823; flagship clinical-research publication.

Is The Lancet reliable to cite? At grade A (86/100 on the SourceScore Index), The Lancet ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.

SourceScore Index
A·86Rank #44 of 130 · top 34%Composite weighted across Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.

A — peer-review + clinical-research authority; high-trust per cite.

Should you cite The Lancet?

At grade A (86/100), The Lancet ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.

Strongest for
tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (95/100).
No major weak spot
Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 80/100.
Bottom line
Cite freely as a primary source.
Compare The Lancet with
Citation Discipline
A+·95

Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.

How Citation Discipline is scored →
Modern Reference
B·82

DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.

How Modern Reference is scored →
Citation Velocity
B·80

Cited by clinicians + medical journalism; narrower volume than wire news but high per-cite trust.

How Citation Velocity is scored →

Where The Lancet ranks in our best-of lists

It is on 1 of our 17 lists of the best sources to cite.

Signals behind these scores

Citation Discipline

A+·95
  • Peer review
    Editor + ≥2 reviewer cycles before publication.

Modern Reference

B·82
  • DOI
    Permanent identifier per article.

Citation Velocity

B·80
  • Citation impact factor
    ~98 (top of medical-journal venues).

Cite this score

Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.

Markdown
[The Lancet — SourceScore Index 86 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/the-lancet/)
HTML
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/the-lancet/">The Lancet — SourceScore Index 86 (A)</a>
APA
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). The Lancet: SourceScore Index 86 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/the-lancet/

4 head-to-head comparisons

See all The Lancet comparisons →

Each comparison sets The Lancet beside another source on all three scores and shows which one scores higher on each.

5 sources at The Lancet's tier

See peer group →

The five sources with the closest overall score to The Lancet, from any category, and where each one scores higher or lower on Discipline, Modern Reference and Velocity.

Embed this score

All embed options →

Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.

<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/the-lancet/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: The Lancet"></iframe>

Frequently asked questions

Is The Lancet a reliable source to cite?

The Lancet scores A (86/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, The Lancet ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 95/100, Modern Reference 82/100, and Citation Velocity 80/100 — full breakdown above.

What is The Lancet's SourceScore?

The Lancet (thelancet.com) scores 86/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 95/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 82/100, Citation Velocity 80/100. Verified 2026-04-28.

How does SourceScore evaluate The Lancet?

The Lancet is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.

Why does The Lancet score A?

A — peer-review + clinical-research authority; high-trust per cite.

What is The Lancet?

Peer-reviewed general medical journal since 1823; flagship clinical-research publication. Category: Health. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.