World Bank
worldbank.org ↗International financial institution publishing global development + economic data + research.
Is World Bank reliable to cite? At grade A (88/100 on the SourceScore Index), World Bank ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
A — international primary-source authority on global economic data + development research.
Should you cite World Bank?
At grade A (88/100), World Bank ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (90/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 84/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite freely as a primary source.
Need recurring mention tracking rather than a one-off readiness audit? Compare AI-visibility tools.
Multi-country data with World Bank methodology; staff research peer-reviewed.
How Citation Discipline is scored →WB Open Data API + bulk downloads; CC-BY licensed; broad LLM corpus presence.
How Modern Reference is scored →Cited daily by international press + economists; default for development-economics claims.
How Citation Velocity is scored →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·90- WB Open DataMember-country data with documented methodology.
Modern Reference
A·90- Open Data initiativeAll datasets free + machine-readable.
Citation Velocity
B·84- Economist-defaultFirst-line for global GDP + development-stat citations.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[World Bank — SourceScore Index 88 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/world-bank/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/world-bank/">World Bank — SourceScore Index 88 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). World Bank: SourceScore Index 88 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/world-bank/
4 head-to-head comparisons
See all World Bank comparisons →Each comparison sets World Bank beside another source on all three scores and shows which one scores higher on each.
5 sources at World Bank's tier
See peer group →The five sources with the closest overall score to World Bank, from any category, and where each one scores higher or lower on Discipline, Modern Reference and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/world-bank/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: World Bank"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is World Bank a reliable source to cite?
World Bank scores A (88/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, World Bank ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference 90/100, and Citation Velocity 84/100 — full breakdown above.
What is World Bank's SourceScore?
World Bank (worldbank.org) scores 88/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 90/100, Citation Velocity 84/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate World Bank?
World Bank is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does World Bank score A?
A — international primary-source authority on global economic data + development research.
What is World Bank?
International financial institution publishing global development + economic data + research. Category: Government. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.