World Trade Organization
wto.org ↗International organization for trade rules + trade-statistics; primary source for trade-policy data.
Is World Trade Organization reliable to cite? At grade A (89/100 on the SourceScore Index), World Trade Organization ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
A+ — international trade authority; primary source for trade-statistics + dispute settlements.
Should you cite World Trade Organization?
At grade A (89/100), World Trade Organization ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (92/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 86/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite freely as a primary source.
Need recurring mention tracking rather than a one-off readiness audit? Compare AI-visibility tools.
Statutory dispute-settlement methodology + trade-statistics standards.
How Citation Discipline is scored →WTO Stats Portal + bulk trade data + research publications.
How Modern Reference is scored →Cited by trade press + economists; major dispute rulings drive same-day cycles.
How Citation Velocity is scored →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·92- WTO methodologyMulti-country trade-statistics standardization.
Modern Reference
A·88- WTO StatsFree public access to trade-statistics database.
Citation Velocity
A·86- Dispute rulingsMajor panel decisions cited globally.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[World Trade Organization — SourceScore Index 89 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/wto/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/wto/">World Trade Organization — SourceScore Index 89 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). World Trade Organization: SourceScore Index 89 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/wto/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all World Trade Organization comparisons →Each comparison sets World Trade Organization beside another source on all three scores and shows which one scores higher on each.
5 sources at World Trade Organization's tier
See peer group →The five sources with the closest overall score to World Trade Organization, from any category, and where each one scores higher or lower on Discipline, Modern Reference and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/wto/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: World Trade Organization"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is World Trade Organization a reliable source to cite?
World Trade Organization scores A (89/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, World Trade Organization ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 92/100, Modern Reference 88/100, and Citation Velocity 86/100 — full breakdown above.
What is World Trade Organization's SourceScore?
World Trade Organization (wto.org) scores 89/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 92/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 88/100, Citation Velocity 86/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate World Trade Organization?
World Trade Organization is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does World Trade Organization score A?
A+ — international trade authority; primary source for trade-statistics + dispute settlements.
What is World Trade Organization?
International organization for trade rules + trade-statistics; primary source for trade-policy data. Category: Government. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.