SourceScore
VELOCITY · 35% of composite

Anthropic Research vs OpenAI Research — Velocity

How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.

By Published by Caslon MediaScored against methodology v0.1Scores last verified
Verdict

OpenAI Research outscores Anthropic Research on Citation Velocity by 4 points (B · 76 vs B · 72).

Academic

Anthropic Research

anthropic.com
B·72
Rank #109 of 130 on Velocity

Cited within AI research + tech press; growing share of citation in AI/safety space.

Higher Velocity
Academic

OpenAI Research

openai.com
B·76
Rank #95 of 130 on Velocity

Cited by AI research + tech press globally; major model releases drive cycles.

Global rank · Velocity

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
Anthropic Research
anthropic.com
72B·72#109 / 130view →
OpenAI Research
openai.com
76B·76#95 / 130view →

Why these Velocity scores

Anthropic ResearchB·72
Velocity · 72/100

Cited within AI research + tech press; growing share of citation in AI/safety space.

OpenAI ResearchB·76
Velocity · 76/100

Cited by AI research + tech press globally; major model releases drive cycles.

Signals behind the Velocity score

Anthropic Research
  • AI-research citation
    Frequently cited by current AI/safety papers.
OpenAI Research
  • Model-release cycle
    Major announcements drive same-day citation surges.

Other dimensions for Anthropic Research vs OpenAI Research

SourceScore Index
Composite head-to-head — Anthropic Research leads
Discipline
Anthropic Research +6 pts
Modern Reference
Anthropic Research +2 pts

Other Velocity comparisons

Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.