SourceScore
DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite

Ars Technica vs LWN.net — Discipline

How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.

By Published by Caslon MediaScored against methodology v0.1Scores last verified
Verdict

LWN.net outscores Ars Technica on Citation Discipline by 12 points (A · 90 vs B · 78).

Tech News

Ars Technica

arstechnica.com
B·78
Rank #109 of 130 on Discipline

Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.

Higher Discipline
Tech News

LWN.net

lwn.net
A·90
Rank #63 of 130 on Discipline

Deep technical accuracy + named bylines + per-article rigor + corrections public.

Global rank · Discipline

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
Ars Technica
arstechnica.com
78B·78#109 / 130view →
LWN.net
lwn.net
90A·90#63 / 130view →

Why these Discipline scores

Ars TechnicaB·78
Discipline · 78/100

Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.

LWN.netA·90
Discipline · 90/100

Deep technical accuracy + named bylines + per-article rigor + corrections public.

Signals behind the Discipline score

Ars Technica
  • Named bylines
    Author + email + bio on every article.
LWN.net
  • Technical depth
    Strong technical-accuracy reputation in Linux community.

Other dimensions for Ars Technica vs LWN.net

SourceScore Index
Composite head-to-head — LWN.net leads
Modern Reference
Ars Technica +2 pts
Velocity
tie (70)

Other Discipline comparisons

Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.