New England Journal of Medicine vs The Lancet — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
New England Journal of Medicine outscores The Lancet on Citation Discipline by 1 points (A+ · 96 vs A+ · 95).
New England Journal of Medicine
Rigorous peer-review; clinical-trial registration mandatory; data disclosure standards.
The Lancet
Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Rigorous peer-review; clinical-trial registration mandatory; data disclosure standards.
Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- ICMJE complianceStrict International Committee of Medical Journal Editors standards.
- Peer reviewEditor + ≥2 reviewer cycles before publication.
Other dimensions for New England Journal of Medicine vs The Lancet
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — The Lancet (thelancet.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/nejm-vs-the-lancet/discipline.json