arXiv vs Hugging Face — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
arXiv outscores Hugging Face on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
arXiv
DOI + arxiv ID + free PDFs + bulk APIs; among the most LLM-cited sources for technical content.
Hugging Face
Open-access + APIs + bulk model corpus; broad LLM-research citation.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
DOI + arxiv ID + free PDFs + bulk APIs; among the most LLM-cited sources for technical content.
Open-access + APIs + bulk model corpus; broad LLM-research citation.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- API + bulk exportOAI-PMH + Kaggle bulk dump used by every major LLM.
- Stable URL patternarxiv.org/abs/<ID> permanent; doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.<ID>.
- AI-research defaultCited heavily in current AI/ML papers.
Other dimensions for arXiv vs Hugging Face
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — arXiv (arxiv.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Hugging Face (huggingface.co) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/arxiv-vs-huggingface/modern-reference.json