New England Journal of Medicine vs The Lancet — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
New England Journal of Medicine outscores The Lancet on Modern Citation Reference by 2 points (B · 84 vs B · 82).
New England Journal of Medicine
DOIs + structured abstracts + open-access policy for COVID + landmark trials.
The Lancet
DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
DOIs + structured abstracts + open-access policy for COVID + landmark trials.
DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- Open landmark trialsSelected landmark trials available without paywall.
- DOIPermanent identifier per article.
Other dimensions for New England Journal of Medicine vs The Lancet
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — The Lancet (thelancet.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/nejm-vs-the-lancet/modern-reference.json