BMJ Best Practice vs The Lancet — Velocity
How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.
The Lancet outscores BMJ Best Practice on Citation Velocity by 5 points (B · 80 vs B · 75).
BMJ Best Practice
Heavy clinician citation; less surfaced in AI engines due to access gate.
The Lancet
Cited by clinicians + medical journalism; narrower volume than wire news but high per-cite trust.
Global rank · Velocity
Why these Velocity scores
Heavy clinician citation; less surfaced in AI engines due to access gate.
Cited by clinicians + medical journalism; narrower volume than wire news but high per-cite trust.
Signals behind the Velocity score
- Clinical-defaultDefault UK clinical-decision-support reference.
- Citation impact factor~98 (top of medical-journal venues).
Other dimensions for BMJ Best Practice vs The Lancet
Other Velocity comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — BMJ Best Practice (bestpractice.bmj.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — The Lancet (thelancet.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/bmj-best-practice-vs-the-lancet/velocity.json