U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs World Health Organization — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention outscores World Health Organization on Citation Discipline by 5 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 90).
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Surveillance + outbreak data subject to peer-review + ethics oversight; MMWR is the standard.
World Health Organization
Member-state data with international auditing; methodology documented per data series.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Surveillance + outbreak data subject to peer-review + ethics oversight; MMWR is the standard.
Member-state data with international auditing; methodology documented per data series.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- MMWRMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report — peer-reviewed public-health journal.
- International auditingMember-state data subject to international peer review.
Other dimensions for U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs World Health Organization
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — World Health Organization (who.int) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/cdc-gov-vs-who/discipline.json