Cell vs Nature — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Cell outscores Nature on Citation Discipline by 1 points (A+ · 96 vs A+ · 95).
Cell
Rigorous peer review; high rejection rate; corrections + retractions public; methodology required.
Nature
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Rigorous peer review; high rejection rate; corrections + retractions public; methodology required.
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Peer-review rigorAmong the highest-rejection biology journals; multi-round review standard.
- Peer reviewEditorial + ≥2 reviewer cycles before publication.
- Open data policyMandatory data deposit for empirical papers since 2016.
Other dimensions for Cell vs Nature
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Cell (cell.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Nature (nature.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/cell-vs-nature/discipline.json