Council on Foreign Relations vs Foreign Affairs — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Foreign Affairs outscores Council on Foreign Relations on Citation Discipline by 4 points (A · 92 vs A · 88).
Council on Foreign Relations
Named-fellow scholarship + editorial review; established think-tank standards.
Foreign Affairs
Editor-supervised; named authors (typically academics or practitioners); fact-check process.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Named-fellow scholarship + editorial review; established think-tank standards.
Editor-supervised; named authors (typically academics or practitioners); fact-check process.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- CFR fellowsSenior fellows with disclosed expertise + credentials.
- CFR editorialCouncil on Foreign Relations editorial-board oversight.
Other dimensions for Council on Foreign Relations vs Foreign Affairs
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Council on Foreign Relations (cfr.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Foreign Affairs (foreignaffairs.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/cfr-vs-foreign-affairs/discipline.json