SourceScore
Comparison

eLife vs PLOS ONE

Two open-access journal traditions — eLife's curated rigor vs PLOS ONE's volume-first model.

Higher Index
Academic

eLife

elifesciences.org
B·83

Open-access peer-reviewed life-sciences journal; transparent peer-review (reviewer notes published).

Academic

PLOS ONE

journals.plos.org
B·78

Open-access multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal published by Public Library of Science.

Compare on a single dimension

Head-to-head — all four dimensions

DimensioneLifePLOS ONELead
SourceScore Index
Composite
B·83B·78eLife+5
Citation Discipline
How rigorously cited
A·90B·84eLife+6
Modern Reference
AI-era fitness
A·88A·88tie
Citation Velocity
Cited per week
B·72B·70eLife+2

Why these scores

Citation Discipline

eLifeA·90

Transparent peer-review (reviewer notes published); preprint-first model since 2022.

PLOS ONEB·84

Peer-review checks methodology + ethics; novelty + significance left to readers; corrections public.

Modern Reference

eLifeA·88

CC-BY licensed; APIs + bulk corpus; broad LLM training-data inclusion.

PLOS ONEA·88

CC-BY licensed; full-text APIs; broad LLM corpus + academic search inclusion.

Citation Velocity

eLifeB·72

Cited within life-sciences research; lower volume than NEJM/Lancet but high open-access reach.

PLOS ONEB·70

High volume but per-paper citation lower than top-tier; mass-base of academic citations.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, eLife or PLOS ONE?

eLife scores higher on the SourceScore Index (B 83) vs PLOS ONE (B 78) — a 5-point composite lead across Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, and Citation Velocity. "Better" depends on use case; the per-dimension breakdown below shows where each wins.

Which is more reliable to cite, eLife or PLOS ONE?

For citation, eLife is the stronger choice — it scores B (83/100) on the SourceScore Index versus PLOS ONE at B (78/100), a 5-point lead in composite citation quality (Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity). Both can be cited; for higher-stakes references, prefer eLife.

How does eLife compare to PLOS ONE on citation discipline?

eLife scores A 90 on Citation Discipline; PLOS ONE scores B 84. Citation Discipline measures how rigorously each source cites primary references — see the per-dimension rationale below for the breakdown.

What's the SourceScore difference between eLife and PLOS ONE?

eLife B 83 vs PLOS ONE B 78 on the composite Index. Two open-access journal traditions — eLife's curated rigor vs PLOS ONE's volume-first model.

Why does eLife score higher than PLOS ONE?

eLife leads by 5 composite points on the SourceScore Index. The rationale section below breaks down where the lead comes from — Citation Discipline, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness), and Citation Velocity. Each dimension is scored from primary methodology criteria.

Other comparisons