SourceScore
Academic

PLOS ONE

journals.plos.org

Open-access multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal published by Public Library of Science.

SourceScore Index
B·78Rank #96 of 130 · top 74%Composite weighted across Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.

A- — open-access pioneer; peer-review focused on methodological soundness, not novelty.

Should you cite PLOS ONE?

At grade B (78/100), PLOS ONE is a solid, generally citable source.

Strongest for
AI-era retrieval and current-topic queries — its highest dimension is Modern Reference (88/100).
No major weak spot
Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 70/100.
Bottom line
Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Compare PLOS ONE with
Citation Discipline
B·84

Peer-review checks methodology + ethics; novelty + significance left to readers; corrections public.

About this sub-score →
Modern Reference
A·88

CC-BY licensed; full-text APIs; broad LLM corpus + academic search inclusion.

About this sub-score →
Citation Velocity
B·70

High volume but per-paper citation lower than top-tier; mass-base of academic citations.

About this sub-score →

Signals behind these scores

Citation Discipline

B·84
  • PLOS editorial
    Methodological-soundness model rather than novelty filter.

Modern Reference

A·88
  • Open-access standard
    Pioneered the open-access publishing model.

Citation Velocity

B·70
  • Volume model
    Tens of thousands of papers/year vs Nature's ~3k.

Cite this score

Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.

Markdown
[PLOS ONE — SourceScore Index 78 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/plos-one/)
HTML
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/plos-one/">PLOS ONE — SourceScore Index 78 (B)</a>
APA
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). PLOS ONE: SourceScore Index 78 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/plos-one/

1 head-to-head comparison

See all PLOS ONE comparisons →

PLOS ONE appears in one canonical SourceScore comparison — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.

5 sources at PLOS ONE's tier

See peer group →

Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats PLOS ONE on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.

Embed this score

All embed options →

Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.

<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/plos-one/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: PLOS ONE"></iframe>

Frequently asked questions

Is PLOS ONE a reliable source to cite?

PLOS ONE scores B (78/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, PLOS ONE is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 84/100, Modern Reference 88/100, and Citation Velocity 70/100 — full breakdown above.

What is PLOS ONE's SourceScore?

PLOS ONE (journals.plos.org) scores 78/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 84/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 88/100, Citation Velocity 70/100. Verified 2026-04-28.

How does SourceScore evaluate PLOS ONE?

PLOS ONE is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.

Why does PLOS ONE score B?

A- — open-access pioneer; peer-review focused on methodological soundness, not novelty.

What is PLOS ONE?

Open-access multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal published by Public Library of Science. Category: Academic. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.