European Medicines Agency vs U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration outscores European Medicines Agency on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A · 92 vs A · 89).
European Medicines Agency
Open data + structured documents; multi-language EU coverage.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
Open data + structured documents; multi-language EU coverage.
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- EMA databasesPublic databases for drugs + clinical trials + safety alerts.
- OpenFDA APIFree public APIs for adverse events, recalls, drug labels.
Other dimensions for European Medicines Agency vs U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — European Medicines Agency (ema.europa.eu) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — U.S. Food and Drug Administration (fda.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/ema-europa-vs-fda-gov/modern-reference.json