U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs World Health Organization — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration outscores World Health Organization on Modern Citation Reference by 4 points (A · 92 vs A · 88).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
World Health Organization
Free public data + APIs + multi-language coverage (6 official UN languages).
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
Free public data + APIs + multi-language coverage (6 official UN languages).
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- OpenFDA APIFree public APIs for adverse events, recalls, drug labels.
- WHO open dataFree public APIs across health-data series.
Other dimensions for U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs World Health Organization
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — U.S. Food and Drug Administration (fda.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — World Health Organization (who.int) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/fda-gov-vs-who/modern-reference.json