GitHub vs MDN Web Docs — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
MDN Web Docs outscores GitHub on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
GitHub
Free APIs + bulk repo data + CC-licensed code; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
MDN Web Docs
Open-source content (CC-BY-SA + MIT for examples); GitHub-tracked; full structured data.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
Free APIs + bulk repo data + CC-licensed code; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
Open-source content (CC-BY-SA + MIT for examples); GitHub-tracked; full structured data.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- Open code corpusDefault LLM training source for code generation.
- Open-source docsgithub.com/mdn/content tracks every page; CC-BY-SA license.
Other dimensions for GitHub vs MDN Web Docs
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — GitHub (github.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — MDN Web Docs (developer.mozilla.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/github-vs-mdn-web-docs/modern-reference.json