The Globe and Mail vs The New York Times — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
The New York Times outscores The Globe and Mail on Citation Discipline by 6 points (A · 88 vs B · 82).
The Globe and Mail
Strong editorial standards, named bylines, public corrections, fact-check process.
The New York Times
Multi-source verification; fact-check + corrections processes public; named bylines + editor accountability.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Strong editorial standards, named bylines, public corrections, fact-check process.
Multi-source verification; fact-check + corrections processes public; named bylines + editor accountability.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Canadian press councilAdheres to National NewsMedia Council standards.
- Public correctionsDaily corrections column dating back decades.
- Editor accountabilityPublic editor / standards editor roles.
Other dimensions for The Globe and Mail vs The New York Times
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — The Globe and Mail (theglobeandmail.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — The New York Times (nytimes.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/globe-and-mail-vs-nyt/discipline.json