National Geographic vs Smithsonian Magazine — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
National Geographic outscores Smithsonian Magazine on Citation Discipline by 2 points (B · 82 vs B · 80).
National Geographic
Long fact-checking tradition; named bylines; sources cited; institutional editorial standards.
Smithsonian Magazine
Fact-checked editorial; named bylines; sources cited inline; Smithsonian institutional standards.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Long fact-checking tradition; named bylines; sources cited; institutional editorial standards.
Fact-checked editorial; named bylines; sources cited inline; Smithsonian institutional standards.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Editorial standards138-year fact-check tradition; National Geographic Society heritage.
- Smithsonian standardsEditorial reviewed against institutional historical + scientific accuracy standards.
Other dimensions for National Geographic vs Smithsonian Magazine
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — National Geographic (nationalgeographic.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Smithsonian Magazine (smithsonianmag.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/natgeo-vs-smithsonian-mag/discipline.json