U.S. National Institutes of Health vs World Health Organization — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
U.S. National Institutes of Health outscores World Health Organization on Modern Citation Reference by 6 points (A · 94 vs A · 88).
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Operates PubMed + NCBI + ClinicalTrials.gov; APIs + bulk data + structured XML throughout.
World Health Organization
Free public data + APIs + multi-language coverage (6 official UN languages).
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
Operates PubMed + NCBI + ClinicalTrials.gov; APIs + bulk data + structured XML throughout.
Free public data + APIs + multi-language coverage (6 official UN languages).
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- ClinicalTrials.govMandatory trial registry, machine-readable.
- WHO open dataFree public APIs across health-data series.
Other dimensions for U.S. National Institutes of Health vs World Health Organization
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — U.S. National Institutes of Health (nih.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — World Health Organization (who.int) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/nih-gov-vs-who/modern-reference.json