Ars Technica vs TechCrunch — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Ars Technica outscores TechCrunch on Citation Discipline by 28 points (B · 78 vs D · 50).
Ars Technica
Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.
TechCrunch
Mix of strong reporting + opinion + rumor; corrections page exists but inconsistent.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.
Mix of strong reporting + opinion + rumor; corrections page exists but inconsistent.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Named bylinesAuthor + email + bio on every article.
- Reporting varianceSome pieces single-sourced from PR; others multi-sourced.
Other dimensions for Ars Technica vs TechCrunch
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Ars Technica (arstechnica.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — TechCrunch (techcrunch.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/ars-technica-vs-techcrunch/discipline.json