The BMJ (British Medical Journal) vs Journal of the American Medical Association — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Journal of the American Medical Association outscores The BMJ (British Medical Journal) on Citation Discipline by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
The BMJ (British Medical Journal)
Peer-review + open-data policy; corrections + retractions public; investigative-rigor standard.
Journal of the American Medical Association
Strict peer-review + ICMJE compliance + clinical-trial registration mandatory.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Peer-review + open-data policy; corrections + retractions public; investigative-rigor standard.
Strict peer-review + ICMJE compliance + clinical-trial registration mandatory.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Open dataMandatory data-sharing for clinical trials.
- AMA editorialAMA editorial board oversight + medical-research ethics.
Other dimensions for The BMJ (British Medical Journal) vs Journal of the American Medical Association
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — The BMJ (British Medical Journal) (bmj.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Journal of the American Medical Association (jamanetwork.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/bmj-vs-jama/discipline.json