The BMJ (British Medical Journal) vs Journal of the American Medical Association — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
The BMJ (British Medical Journal) outscores Journal of the American Medical Association on Modern Citation Reference by 4 points (A · 86 vs B · 82).
The BMJ (British Medical Journal)
Open-access for many articles; structured DOIs + APIs; broad LLM corpus.
Journal of the American Medical Association
DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
Open-access for many articles; structured DOIs + APIs; broad LLM corpus.
DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- BMJ OpenOpen-access sister publication; full-text free.
- DOIPermanent identifier per article.
Other dimensions for The BMJ (British Medical Journal) vs Journal of the American Medical Association
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — The BMJ (British Medical Journal) (bmj.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Journal of the American Medical Association (jamanetwork.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/bmj-vs-jama/modern-reference.json