Journal of the American Medical Association vs New England Journal of Medicine — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
New England Journal of Medicine outscores Journal of the American Medical Association on Citation Discipline by 1 points (A+ · 96 vs A+ · 95).
Journal of the American Medical Association
Strict peer-review + ICMJE compliance + clinical-trial registration mandatory.
New England Journal of Medicine
Rigorous peer-review; clinical-trial registration mandatory; data disclosure standards.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Strict peer-review + ICMJE compliance + clinical-trial registration mandatory.
Rigorous peer-review; clinical-trial registration mandatory; data disclosure standards.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- AMA editorialAMA editorial board oversight + medical-research ethics.
- ICMJE complianceStrict International Committee of Medical Journal Editors standards.
Other dimensions for Journal of the American Medical Association vs New England Journal of Medicine
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Journal of the American Medical Association (jamanetwork.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/jama-vs-nejm/discipline.json