Journal of the American Medical Association vs New England Journal of Medicine — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
New England Journal of Medicine outscores Journal of the American Medical Association on Modern Citation Reference by 2 points (B · 84 vs B · 82).
Journal of the American Medical Association
DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.
New England Journal of Medicine
DOIs + structured abstracts + open-access policy for COVID + landmark trials.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
DOIs + structured abstracts; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.
DOIs + structured abstracts + open-access policy for COVID + landmark trials.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- DOIPermanent identifier per article.
- Open landmark trialsSelected landmark trials available without paywall.
Other dimensions for Journal of the American Medical Association vs New England Journal of Medicine
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Journal of the American Medical Association (jamanetwork.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/jama-vs-nejm/modern-reference.json