Nature vs PNAS — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
PNAS outscores Nature on Citation Discipline by 1 points (A+ · 96 vs A+ · 95).
Nature
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
PNAS
Peer-reviewed by NAS members; rigorous review across all sciences; corrections + retractions public.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Peer-reviewed by NAS members; rigorous review across all sciences; corrections + retractions public.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Peer reviewEditorial + ≥2 reviewer cycles before publication.
- Open data policyMandatory data deposit for empirical papers since 2016.
- NAS-affiliated peer reviewThree-track review (NAS member, contributed, direct submission); standardized rigor.
Other dimensions for Nature vs PNAS
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Nature (nature.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — PNAS (pnas.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/nature-vs-pnas/discipline.json