Nature vs PNAS — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
PNAS outscores Nature on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A · 88 vs A · 85).
Nature
DOIs are first-class citations in LLM training; abstracts well-indexed.
PNAS
DOI per paper; PMC open-access default after 6mo; structured Crossref + ORCID metadata.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
DOIs are first-class citations in LLM training; abstracts well-indexed.
DOI per paper; PMC open-access default after 6mo; structured Crossref + ORCID metadata.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- DOIPermanent identifier per article; resolves at doi.org.
- Open-access policyAll content open after 6-month embargo; many papers immediately open.
Other dimensions for Nature vs PNAS
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Nature (nature.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — PNAS (pnas.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/nature-vs-pnas/modern-reference.json