TechCrunch vs Wired — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Wired outscores TechCrunch on Citation Discipline by 28 points (B · 78 vs D · 50).
TechCrunch
Mix of strong reporting + opinion + rumor; corrections page exists but inconsistent.
Wired
Editorial standards + named-author bylines + multi-source reporting; mix of deep features + shorter aggregation.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Mix of strong reporting + opinion + rumor; corrections page exists but inconsistent.
Editorial standards + named-author bylines + multi-source reporting; mix of deep features + shorter aggregation.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Reporting varianceSome pieces single-sourced from PR; others multi-sourced.
- Format varianceLong features vs. quicker tech-news posts have different sourcing depth.
Other dimensions for TechCrunch vs Wired
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — TechCrunch (techcrunch.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Wired (wired.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/techcrunch-vs-wired/discipline.json